Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 April 20243333705

Land at Littleton Drew, Chippenham, SN14 7LZ

the change of use of land to private family traveller site and associated development

Authority
Wiltshire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Murray D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the living conditions of the occupiers from traffic noise from the M4
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area and the Cotswolds National Landscape
  • Whether the site has good accessibility to services and facilities
  • The effect on ecology and biodiversity
  • The need for and supply of gypsy/traveller sites
  • The availability of alternative sites
  • The personal circumstances of the appellant and best interests of children

What decided it

The combination of significant noise harm to occupiers' living conditions and substantial visual harm to the Cotswolds National Landscape outweighed the benefits of meeting gypsy/traveller need and the appellant's personal circumstances.

The significant weight attached to the lack of a five-year supply of gypsy/traveller sites, absence of alternative sites, and the appellant's personal circumstances/best interests of children did not outweigh the harm from noise to living conditions and the significant visual intrusion into the Cotswolds National Landscape, so the conflict with the development plan and Framework was not outweighed.

Framework references: 191, 182, 109

Plan policies cited: Core Policy 47, Policy NE18, Core Policy 51

Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.