Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 April 20243333705

Land at Littleton Drew, Chippenham, SN14 7LZ

Planning appeal 3333705 at Land at Littleton Drew, Chippenham, SN14 7LZ (Wiltshire Council) was dismissed on 16 April 2024 by Inspector Murray D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the living conditions of the occupiers from traffic noise from the M4.

the change of use of land to private family traveller site and associated development

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Murray D
Postcode
SN14 7LZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the living conditions of the occupiers from traffic noise from the M4
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area and the Cotswolds National Landscape
  • Whether the site has good accessibility to services and facilities
  • The effect on ecology and biodiversity
  • The need for and supply of gypsy/traveller sites
  • The availability of alternative sites
  • The personal circumstances of the appellant and best interests of children

What decided it

The combination of significant noise harm to occupiers' living conditions and substantial visual harm to the Cotswolds National Landscape outweighed the benefits of meeting gypsy/traveller need and the appellant's personal circumstances.

The significant weight attached to the lack of a five-year supply of gypsy/traveller sites, absence of alternative sites, and the appellant's personal circumstances/best interests of children did not outweigh the harm from noise to living conditions and the significant visual intrusion into the Cotswolds National Landscape, so the conflict with the development plan and Framework was not outweighed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 47Policy NE18Core Policy 51
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 191Paragraph 182Paragraph 109
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

3 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wiltshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed30 September 20266007924
    Beehive Cottage, Portway, Salisbury, SP4 6BL
  2. Dismissed13 July 20266002635
    Castle View Care Centre, 8 Old Castle Road, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 3SF
  3. Allowed23 June 20266006895
    Poles Farm, Swallowcliffe, Salisbury, SP3 5NX
  4. Dismissed11 June 20266004915
    The Spice Merchant, Holloway, Malmesbury, SN16 9HX
  5. Dismissed6 May 20266002845
    Land South of Drynham Lane, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, BA14 0PL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.