Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 August 20243333765

33 Crummock Gardens, London, NW9 0DE

Planning appeal 3333765 at 33 Crummock Gardens, London, NW9 0DE (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 15 August 2024 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers, with regard to light and outlook.

the change of use from a Class C3 dwelling to a Class C4 HMO

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
NW9 0DE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers, with regard to light and outlook
  • whether the proposed development would achieve an appropriate level of fire safety
  • whether the proposed development would contribute appropriately to meeting local housing need
  • whether the appeal site would provide an appropriate location for a House in Multiple Occupation having regard to proximity to public transport and local facilities
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of surrounding occupiers, with regard to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The proposal would not provide appropriate communal facilities with adequate light and outlook, and would fail to achieve appropriate fire safety standards, which when combined with the loss of a family dwelling for which there is identified need, meant the proposal failed to comply with Policy BH7 of the Brent Local Plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BH7Policy DMP1Policy D12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

495 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice upheld30 September 20263359486
    30 Randall Avenue, London, NW2 7RN
  2. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263365031
    73A and the Rear Part of 73 Willesden Lane, Kilburn, London, NW6 7RR
  3. Notice varied and upheld21 August 20263346972
    The Lodge Restaurant, The Lodge, Kingsbury Road, London, NW9 9HA
  4. Notice upheld12 August 20263344966
    46 Aylestone Avenue, London, NW6 7AA
  5. Split Decision10 August 20263349809
    10 Birchen Grove, London, NW9 8SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.