Planning appeal decision
Hideaway, Quarry Wood, Bisham, Marlow, SL7 1RF
Planning appeal 3334138 at Hideaway, Quarry Wood, Bisham, Marlow, SL7 1RF (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 27 April 2026 by Inspector Buchanan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the gates or fencing is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the NPPF and relevant development plan policy.
without planning permission, the erection of a carport and fencing
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Buchanan R
- Postcode
- SL7 1RF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the gates or fencing is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the NPPF and relevant development plan policy
- The effect of the gates or fencing on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- Whether the gates or fencing protect people and property from flooding
- The effect of the gates or fencing on the character or appearance of the area, including this stretch of the River Thames
- Whether other considerations clearly outweigh any harm to the Green Belt and any other harm, so as to amount to very special circumstances
What decided it
The appellant's failure to provide adequate evidence through a site-specific flood risk assessment that the gates and fencing would not impede flood water flow or increase flood risk, combined with the substantial harm from inappropriateness in the Green Belt that was not outweighed by other considerations.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy NR1Policy QP3Policy QP4Policy QP5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 176Paragraph 181
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353235Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353234Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
- Notice varied and upheld17 September 202633621832 Aston Mead, Windsor, SL4 5PW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®