Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 May 20243334142

Land east of Knowle Bank Farm, Priorslee Road, Shifnal, Shropshire, TF11 9PG

the change of use of land to a mixed use for the stabling of horses and as a residential caravan site for two gypsy families, each with two caravans including no more than one static caravan, laying of hardstanding and erection of two ancillary amenity buildings

Authority
Shropshire County Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Hockenhull H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) including its effect on openness and the purposes of the Green Belt
  • whether the proposal meets locally specific criteria for Gypsy and Traveller sites
  • whether the proposal preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Haughton Conservation Area and whether it causes harm to the setting of heritage assets in the locality
  • the effect of the proposal on ecology
  • If it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial harm from inappropriate development, together with significant harm to openness and encroachment into the countryside, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist.

The substantial harm from inappropriate development, significant harm to openness and limited harm to a Green Belt purpose were not clearly outweighed by the lack of five-year Gypsy and Traveller site supply, absence of alternative sites, personal circumstances, and Article 8/PSED considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist and the appeal was dismissed.

Framework references: 143, 153, 154, 180

Plan policies cited: Core Strategy Policy CS5, Policy CS6, Policy CS9, Policy CS12, Policy CS17, Policy MD12, Policy MD13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.