Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 June 20243334168

Pavement Outside 34 Long Causeway, Peterborough, PE1 1YJ

Planning appeal 3334168 at Pavement Outside 34 Long Causeway, Peterborough, PE1 1YJ (Peterborough City Council) was dismissed on 17 June 2024 by Inspector Bell-Williamson J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed communication Hub would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Peterborough City Centre Conservation Area.

Replacement and upgrade of existing illuminated and advertised enclosed telephone kiosk with multifunctional communication Hub including advertisement display

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Bell-Williamson J
Postcode
PE1 1YJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed communication Hub would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Peterborough City Centre Conservation Area

What decided it

The harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area caused by the prominence and incongruity of the Hub and integrated advertisement outweighed the public benefits of communications infrastructure.

The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Peterborough City Centre Conservation Area, afforded considerable weight, was not outweighed by the public benefits of communications infrastructure and the range of services provided by the Hub.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP16Policy LP19Policy LP13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 118Paragraph 205Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

125 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Peterborough

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed18 September 20266011697
    27-31 Westgate, Peterborough, PE1 1YH
  2. Dismissed22 May 20266004903
    Shell Fengate, Carr Road, Fengate, Peterborough, PE1 5YA
  3. Dismissed11 July 20253364503
    Land Adjoining (Cavell Blue and) Clare Green Car Park, Queensgate Shopping Centre, Westgate, Peterborough, PE1 1PY
  4. Allowed27 February 20233299201
    Land Adjacent to 30 London Road, Opposite Glebe Road, Peterborough , PE2 8AR
  5. Allowed22 December 20223294410
    Path To The Front Of 3 Hereward Cross, Broadway, Peterborough, PE1 1TA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.