Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 May 20253334300

Park View Upper School and Sixth Form, Church Chare, Chester Le Street, Durham, DH3 3QA

Planning appeal 3334300 at Park View Upper School and Sixth Form, Church Chare, Chester Le Street, Durham, DH3 3QA (Durham County Council) was dismissed on 19 May 2025 by Inspector Dowsett J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby residential properties with particular regard to noise, disturbance, light pollution, and traffic movements/parking.

Proposed artificial grass pitch (AGP) with perimeter mesh fencing, 6 x 15m LED lighting columns, and hard standing areas, plus timber acoustic fencing

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Dowsett J
Postcode
DH3 3QA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby residential properties with particular regard to noise, disturbance, light pollution, and traffic movements/parking
  • The effect of the proposed development on the safe operation of the highway in the vicinity of the appeal site
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area bearing in mind the special attention that should be paid to the desirability of preserving the setting of the nearby Grade I listed building, Church of St Mary and St Cuthbert

What decided it

The inability of the proposed parking management strategy to effectively mitigate the significant harm to living conditions of nearby residents from indiscriminate and opportunistic parking in residential streets, which would conflict with development plan policies and could not be outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme.

The significant and lasting harm to living conditions from indiscriminate and opportunistic parking outweighed the benefits of enhanced sports facilities, modest economic benefits, and biodiversity improvements, resulting in a conflict with the development plan that could not be overcome by material considerations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 29(e)Policy 31Policy 21Policy 44Policy 29(a)Policy 39
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 210Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Durham County Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266007418
    Land to the West of St Michael's Rise, Hawthorn, SR7 8BY
  2. Dismissed16 September 20266005969
    3 Roosevelt Road, Durham, DH1 1PS
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266004850
    119 Bradford Crescent, Durham, DH1 1HW
  4. Dismissed16 September 20266004494
    49 Annand Road, Durham, DH1 1PW
  5. Allowed10 September 20266006352
    55 Bradford Crescent, Gilesgate, Durham, DH1 1HL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.