Planning appeal decision
Park View Upper School and Sixth Form, Church Chare, Chester Le Street, Durham, DH3 3QA
Planning appeal 3334300 at Park View Upper School and Sixth Form, Church Chare, Chester Le Street, Durham, DH3 3QA (Durham County Council) was dismissed on 19 May 2025 by Inspector Dowsett J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby residential properties with particular regard to noise, disturbance, light pollution, and traffic movements/parking.
Proposed artificial grass pitch (AGP) with perimeter mesh fencing, 6 x 15m LED lighting columns, and hard standing areas, plus timber acoustic fencing
- Authority
- Durham County Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Dowsett J
- Postcode
- DH3 3QA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby residential properties with particular regard to noise, disturbance, light pollution, and traffic movements/parking
- The effect of the proposed development on the safe operation of the highway in the vicinity of the appeal site
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area bearing in mind the special attention that should be paid to the desirability of preserving the setting of the nearby Grade I listed building, Church of St Mary and St Cuthbert
What decided it
The inability of the proposed parking management strategy to effectively mitigate the significant harm to living conditions of nearby residents from indiscriminate and opportunistic parking in residential streets, which would conflict with development plan policies and could not be outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme.
The significant and lasting harm to living conditions from indiscriminate and opportunistic parking outweighed the benefits of enhanced sports facilities, modest economic benefits, and biodiversity improvements, resulting in a conflict with the development plan that could not be overcome by material considerations.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 29(e)Policy 31Policy 21Policy 44Policy 29(a)Policy 39
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 210Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Durham County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed22 October 20266007418Land to the West of St Michael's Rise, Hawthorn, SR7 8BY
- Dismissed16 September 202660059693 Roosevelt Road, Durham, DH1 1PS
- Dismissed16 September 20266004850119 Bradford Crescent, Durham, DH1 1HW
- Dismissed16 September 2026600449449 Annand Road, Durham, DH1 1PW
- Allowed10 September 2026600635255 Bradford Crescent, Gilesgate, Durham, DH1 1HL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®