Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 May 20243334333

Heath Hey Puddington Lane, Puddington, NESTON, CH64 5SL

construction of two-storey front and first floor side extensions, single-storey rear extension with first floor balcony area, render to rear and side elevations and portico to main entrance

Authority
Cheshire West and Chester
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Manchester S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing a modest loss of openness, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify it.

Framework references: 142, 152, 154

Plan policies cited: STRAT9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.