Benting Mead, Lonesome Lane, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 7QT

Planning appeal 3334621 at Benting Mead, Lonesome Lane, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 7QT (Reigate and Banstead Borough Council) was decided (appeal withdrawn) on 6 March 2024, by written representations.

Authority: Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
Appeal type: ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: Householder developments

The decision letter

The Inspectorate has not published a letter for this decision, so there is nothing to read beyond the record above. An account opens every letter we do hold, all of them searchable.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

57 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

Dismissed29 October 20266014528
13 Weald Way, Reigate, RH2 7RG
Dismissed19 October 20266008015
Boreham House, Alocks Lane, Kingswood, KT206BB
Allowed5 October 20266007999
Land Adjacent to 'Clouds', Rockshaw Road, Merstham, RH1 3BZ
Invalid5 October 20266007401
50 Nutfield Road, Merstham, RH1 3EP
Allowed28 September 20266007410
50 Nutfield Road, Merstham, RH1 3EP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.