Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 September 20243334689

90 Broad Street, Chesham , Bucks , HP5 3ED

the erection of single-storey one-bedroom one-person self-contained dwelling to the rear of 90 broad street

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bowden N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development provides satisfactory living conditions for the future occupants with particular regard to the provision of outdoor amenity space
  • the effect of the proposed development on the integrity of the Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC)

What decided it

The identified harm to the Beechwoods SAC, which cannot be adequately mitigated in the absence of SANG, engages paragraph 11(d) of the Framework and provides a clear reason for refusal that outweighs the modest housing benefits.

The social, economic and environmental benefits of one new dwelling, including proximity to town centre and car-free design, were outweighed by the identified harm to the SAC, the conflict with character and appearance policies, and the failure to provide adequate outdoor amenity space; the presumption in favour of development was displaced by the SAC harm.

Framework references: 11, 186

Plan policies cited: CS20, CS24, GC1, GC3, H3, H12, NC1

Judgments cited: People over Wind and Sweetman v Coillte Teoranta ECLI:EU:C:2018:244

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.