Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld26 June 20243334741

50 Maud Road, Stratford , London, E13 0JU

Without planning permission the material change of use of the property to two self-contained units of residential accommodation

Authority
London Borough of Newham
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
King T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the borough's stock of family housing
  • whether the two self-contained flats created provide for a satisfactory standard of accommodation for all future occupiers

What decided it

The development fails to provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation for the upper floor family-sized flat due to lack of access to the rear garden as required by LP Policy D6, and fails to comply with the Epping Forest SAMMS mitigation requirements applicable at the time of decision.

the adverse impacts of the unauthorised development significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, with no compelling information to support the breach of planning control

Plan policies cited: NLP Policy H1, NLP Policy H4, NLP Policy S1, NLP Policy S6, NLP Policy SP1, NLP Policy SP2, NLP Policy SP3, NLP Policy SC5, NLP Policy INF2, NLP Policy INF7, LP Policy D4, LP Policy D6, LP Policy GG4, LP Policy H8, LP Policy H10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.