Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 August 20243334822

Land West of 301 Bridgnorth Road, Wightwick, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV6 8BW

Planning appeal 3334822 at Land West of 301 Bridgnorth Road, Wightwick, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV6 8BW (Wolverhampton City Council) was dismissed on 22 August 2024 by Inspector Normington S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

the erection of 6no. self-build dwellings with access and amenity areas, creation of children’s playground and open space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Normington S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect on designated heritage assets and in particular the setting of 'Wightwick Manor and Gardens', which are Grade I and II Listed, and whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Wightwick Bank Conservation Area
  • The effect on ecology and nature conservation
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety
  • Whether sufficient information has been submitted with the application in order to determine the extent to which the site is suitable for development without being at risk from flooding or causing a flood risk elsewhere
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial weight to be given to Green Belt harm by reason of inappropriateness and other identified harms (openness, character, heritage, ecology) is not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing supply and self-build provision, such that very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.

The benefits of housing supply (substantial weight), self-build provision (support from paragraph 70(b)), flood alleviation and open space provision (moderate weight) do not outweigh the substantial weight to be given to Green Belt harm (inappropriateness, loss of openness, encroachment on countryside) and other harms to character and appearance, heritage assets and ecology; the balance tips decisively against the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy G2Policy D6Policy CSP2Policy TNP14 Part APolicy HE5Policy ENV2Policy D12Policy ENV1Policy TNP13Policy AM12Policy AM15Policy TRAN2Policy ENV5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 152Paragraph 142Paragraph 70Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

28 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wolverhampton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed6 June 20253357836
    Land at Hugh Porter Way, Aldersley, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV6 9NW
  2. Dismissed11 October 20233319946
    The Old Stags Head, 65 Church Hill, Penn, Wolverhampton, WV4 5JB
  3. Dismissed18 October 20213276936
    40 Gerrard Road, Willenhall, WV13 3LB
  4. Dismissed29 October 20266013350
    Wergs Road, Wolverhampton, WV6 8QN
  5. Allowed26 October 20266013623
    Footpath Outside 43 Dunkley Street, Worverhampton, WV1 4AN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.