Planning appeal decision
Club House Farm, Church Street, Hinstock, Market Drayton, TF9 2TF
Planning appeal 3334841 at Club House Farm, Church Street, Hinstock, Market Drayton, TF9 2TF (Shropshire County Council) was dismissed on 20 August 2024 by Inspector Normington S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.
an outline planning application (access, landscaping and layout) for the construction of three 3 bed bungalows plus a Self-Build Plot
- Authority
- Shropshire County Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Normington S
- Postcode
- TF9 2TF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- Whether the proposed development would be appropriately located, taking into account the Council's spatial strategy for housing development with particular regard to the location of part of the site in the open countryside
- The effect of the proposed development on existing trees to the west of the appeal site
- Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing
- The effect of the proposed development on protected species
What decided it
The proposal's location predominantly outside the settlement boundary in the open countryside, contrary to the development plan's spatial strategy, combined with the absence of any evidenced exceptions or local need to justify such development, and the failure to provide adequate affordable housing contributions, outweighs the limited benefits of housing delivery in an area with sufficient supply.
The benefits of housing delivery and self-build provision are limited and do not outweigh the environmental harm to character and appearance, the conflict with the development plan's locational strategy, the failure to provide adequate affordable housing, and the undermining of the plan-led approach.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Strategy Policy CS4Core Strategy Policy CS5Core Strategy Policy CS6Core Strategy Policy CS11Core Strategy Policy CS17Core Strategy Policy MD1SAMDev Policy MD2SAMDev Policy MD3SAMDev Policy MD7aSAMDev Policy MD12SAMDev Policy S11.2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 84Paragraph 47Paragraph 70Paragraph 15
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Shropshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed23 October 202660113674, Beechwood Drive, Shrewsbury, SY1 2RF
- Dismissed14 October 202660125411st Floor And 2nd Floor, The Pump House, Coton Hill, Shrewsbury, SY1 2DP
- Allowed13 October 20266012744Grove Farm, Condover, Shrewsbury, SY5 7BH
- Allowed13 October 20266011699Grove Farm, Condover, Shrewsbury, SY5 7BH
- Dismissed9 October 20266011445Land to the East of, 5 The Hem, Shifnal, TF11 9PS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®