Planning appeal decision
Holly Brow, Hollyhurst road, Marbury, Wrenbury, WHITCHURCH, SY13 4LY
‘application for an essential worker dwelling in association with equestrian stud business.’
- Authority
- Cheshire East
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Simpson V
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether there is an essential need for a dwelling to accommodate a rural worker, with regard to local and national development strategies for housing
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The appellant failed to demonstrate an essential functional need for a full-time rural worker to live permanently on the site, contrary to NPPF paragraph 84 and SADPD policy RUR3.
no harm was found to character and appearance, but this did not outweigh the conflict with the development plan as a whole arising from the lack of an essential need for the dwelling, so the appeal was dismissed
Framework references: 84
Plan policies cited: Policy PG1, Policy PG2, Policy PG6, Policy SD2, Policy SE1, Policy RUR3, Policy GEN1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®