Planning appeal decision
Nailsea Electrical Ltd, 102 Gloucester Road, Bishopston, BRISTOL, BS7 8BN
demolition of western part of former chapel and single storey extension and construction of a three-storey extension comprising 9 dwellings (5 small houses in multiple occupation (use class C4) and 4 large houses in multiple occupation (sui generis), retention of 225sqm of Commercial, Business and Service floorspace (use class E), external alterations, associated access and landscaping works
- Authority
- Bristol City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Taylor K
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the Gloucester Road Conservation Area
- the effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupants of nearby dwellings with regard to privacy, noise disturbance, and the physical effect of the building
- the effect of the development on the living conditions of the future occupants of the proposed development with regard to privacy, outlook, daylight and the internal environment of the dwellings
- whether the parking provision would be appropriate having regard to the effect on parking pressures in the locality and highway safety
- whether the development would result in an appropriate balance of housing type in the locality
What decided it
The Council cannot demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, triggering the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d), and the proposal would result in housing provision in a sustainable location making effective use of land with no harm to assets of particular importance or conflict with development plan policies.
Under NPPF paragraph 11(d), planning permission should be granted unless policies protecting assets of particular importance provide a strong reason for refusal or adverse effects would significantly and demonstrably outweigh benefits; there would be no harm to the Conservation Area and the scheme would result in housing provision in a sustainable location making effective use of land, with no conflict with relevant policies, therefore the balance favoured allowing the appeal.
Framework references: 11
Plan policies cited: Policy BCS22, Policy DM31, Policy BCS21, Policy DM27, Policy DM29, Policy DM30, Policy BCS18, Policy BCS13, Policy BCS14, Policy DM2, Policy BSC10, Policy DM23
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®