Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 October 20243336407

Former Quarry House, 81 Quarry Hill Road, Borough Green, Kent, TN15 8RW

erection of a terrace of 4 dwellings with associated gardens and car parking

Authority
Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wallace J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • the effect of the proposed development on the purposes and openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the site is in a suitable location for development with respect to flood risk
  • whether the proposal would have an acceptable effect on biodiversity

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to its openness and purposes, and the site is unsuitable on flood risk grounds, with the housing and other benefits insufficient to clearly outweigh these harms.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt and moderate harm from flood risk unsuitability were not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefit of four additional dwellings and limited benefits from location, economic activity, ecological enhancement and vernacular design, so very special circumstances were not established.

Framework references: 11, 142, 143, 152, 153, 154, 165, 168, 180

Plan policies cited: CS Policy CP3, CS Policy CP10, CS Policy CP12, MDE Policy NE2, MDE Policy NE3

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.