Planning appeal decision
Maisie Cottage Bottrells Lane, Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4EQ
Planning appeal 3336436 at Maisie Cottage Bottrells Lane, Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4EQ (Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *) was dismissed on 9 August 2024 by Inspector Townend K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including considering the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.
conversion and extension of existing stable building to create a one bedroom dwelling served by the existing access
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Townend K
- Postcode
- HP8 4EQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including considering the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
- the effect of the development on the Chilterns National Landscape
- whether the proposed development would provide appropriate living conditions for the occupiers of the unit, with particular regard to internal space
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would fail to preserve the openness of the Green Belt through the creation of formal garden, parking and hardstanding areas with fencing, and would conflict with policies protecting the Chilterns National Landscape, and these harms are not clearly outweighed by the limited social and economic benefits of a single dwelling in a car-dependent location.
The substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt and harm to the Chilterns National Landscape were not clearly outweighed by the limited social and economic benefits of additional housing supply and the scheme's limited ecological benefits, such that very special circumstances do not exist to justify the inappropriate development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB2Policy GB11Policy LSQ1Policy CS22Policy GC3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 143Paragraph 155Paragraph 182
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed1 April 20263372329118 Chalfont Road, Seer Green, Beaconsfield, HP9 2QP
- Notice varied and upheld12 March 20263325136Fenton Civil Engineering Ltd, Rowan Tree Farm Blackwell Hall Lane, Ley Hill, Chesham, HP5 1UN
- Unknown2 March 20263362050Land at National Society for Epilepsy, Chesham Lane, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4AD
- Notice upheld2 February 20263332205The Stables Frith Hill, South Heath, Great Missenden, HP16 9QF
- Dismissed23 January 20263372876Parkwood Farm Maltmans Lane, Chalfont St. Peter, Gerrards Cross, SL9 8RP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®