Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 May 20243336625

6 Mill Lane, Aylsham, Norfolk, NR11 6WA

New roof terrace with associated second floor area

Authority
Broadland District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Russell M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including but not limited to the setting of the Grade II Listed 'St Michael's Hospital'
  • the living conditions of occupiers of No 4 Mill Lane with particular regard to privacy

What decided it

The proposal would result in significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and the setting of the Grade II listed building, with no public benefits sufficient to outweigh this harm, combined with unacceptable privacy impacts on neighbouring occupiers.

Framework references: 135

Plan policies cited: Policy 2 (Improving the Design of Development) of the Aylsham Neighbourhood Plan (2019), Policy GC4 (Design) of the Broadland District Council Development Management DPD (2015), Policy 1 (Addressing climate change and protecting environmental assets) of the Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk (adopted 2011 amended 2014), Policy 2 (Promoting good design) of the Joint Core Strategy for Broadland, Norwich and South Norfolk (adopted 2011 amended 2014)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.