Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 January 20253336819

Land Adjacent to the George and Dragon, Baughurst Road, Wolverton Townsend , Hampshire, RG26 5ST

Planning appeal 3336819 at Land Adjacent to the George and Dragon, Baughurst Road, Wolverton Townsend , Hampshire, RG26 5ST (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was dismissed on 8 January 2025 by Inspector Normington S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable for the development and sustainably located having regard to the settlement policies of the development plan.

the erection of 3 no. dwellings with associated parking, turning, private amenity space, landscaping, and creation of new access on Wolverton Townsend

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Normington S
Postcode
RG26 5ST

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable for the development and sustainably located having regard to the settlement policies of the development plan
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area having particular regard to the effect on the North Wessex Downs National Landscape
  • The effect of the proposed development on the special interest of heritage assets with particular regard to the setting of the Grade II Listed George and Dragon Public House
  • The effect of the proposed development on existing trees
  • The effect on the living conditions of the prospective occupants of the proposed development with particular regard to the shading of rear gardens
  • The effect of the proposed development on protected species
  • The effect of the proposed development on flood risk and drainage
  • Whether the proposed development would provide a suitable mix of dwellings

What decided it

The cumulative weight of harm to the character and appearance of the North Wessex Downs National Landscape and less than substantial harm to the setting of the Grade II Listed George and Dragon Public House significantly and demonstrably outweighs the modest benefits of three additional dwellings.

The modest social and economic benefits of three additional dwellings and biodiversity net gain were outweighed by the significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and National Landscape and less than substantial harm to the designated heritage asset, with the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing the benefits when assessed against the Framework policies as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SS1Policy SS6Policy EM1Policy EM10Policy EM11Policy CN3Policy EM4Policy EM7Policy SD1Policy LA 06
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 189Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215Paragraph 232

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

9 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed6 August 20266007440
    Land West Of Millars, Station Road, Cliddesden, RG25 2FG
  2. Allowed19 June 20266005805
    White Bungalow, Ash Lane, Silchester, RG7 2NL
  3. Allowed16 June 20266004924
    Newlyn House, North of West Ham Lane, Basingstoke, RG22 5EE
  4. Allowed11 June 20266002358
    Land at Lower Wyke, St Mary Bourne, SP116AW
  5. Allowed26 May 20263375485
    Land North Of Whitchurch Station, Whitchurch, RG28 7ED

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.