Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 October 20243337023

Marie Louise Barn , Cockmannings Lane, Orpington, BR5 4FF

Planning appeal 3337023 at Marie Louise Barn , Cockmannings Lane, Orpington, BR5 4FF (London Borough of Bromley) was dismissed on 11 October 2024 by Inspector Manley N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and development plan policies, and the effect it would have on the openness of the Green Belt.

a “Single storey front extension

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Manley N
Postcode
BR5 4FF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and development plan policies, and the effect it would have on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt by reason of disproportionate additions to the original building and harm to openness, and no very special circumstances exist to justify it.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 49Policy 51
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 142Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

162 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Bromley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Split Decision5 August 20263378375
    Land Adjoining and to the West of Jodeen Animal Sanctuary, Sevenoaks Road, Halstead, Kent, TN14 7HR
  2. Dismissed30 April 20266005662
    336 Main Road, Biggin Hill, Westerham, Kent, TN16 2HL
  3. Allowed17 April 20266000833
    Land Between 127 & 129 Leaves Green Road, Keston, BR2 6DG
  4. Notice varied and upheld31 March 20263343405
    Land to the Rear of 50 to 54 Cudham Lane, Cudham, TN14 7QY
  5. Dismissed18 March 20263375346
    Downe Court, Cudham Road, Downe, Orpington, Bromley, BR6 7LF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.