Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 September 20243337331

Land North of High Winds, Reeds Lane, Southwater, West Sussex, RH13 9DQ

Planning appeal 3337331 at Land North of High Winds, Reeds Lane, Southwater, West Sussex, RH13 9DQ (Horsham District Council) was dismissed on 23 September 2024 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be in a suitable location for housing.

the construction of detached two storey dwelling with attached double garage and access from Reeds Lane

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
RH13 9DQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be in a suitable location for housing
  • the effect of the proposal on ecology and biodiversity

What decided it

The significant harm arising from the proposal not being in a suitable location for housing, combined with uncertainty about harm to protected species and biodiversity, outweighed the limited benefits of a single dwelling even under the tilted balance.

The adverse impacts of the proposal, comprising significant harm from unsustainable location and uncertain harm to biodiversity and protected species, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing supply and a potential self-build dwelling, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 2Policy 3Policy 4Policy 26Policy 31
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

25 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Horsham District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed29 October 20266008830
    Staalcot Farm Stall House Lane, Stall House Lane, North Heath, RH20 2HR
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266007051
    Bentley House, North Heath Lane Industrial Estate, North Heath Lane, Horsham, RH12 5QE
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266012640
    The Fords, Bonfire Hill, Southwater, RH13 9BU
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266008205
    Barnards Nursery, Rock Road, Washington, RH20 3BH
  5. Allowed12 October 20266011680
    Land at High Chaparral, London Road, Washington, RH20 3BP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.