Planning appeal decision
32a Rucklers Lane, Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, WD4 8AU
Planning appeal 3337359 at 32a Rucklers Lane, Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, WD4 8AU (Dacorum Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 October 2024 by Inspector Chalk M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including any effect on openness, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework.
demolition of existing dwelling and outbuildings. Construction of one 2-bedroom and two 3-bedroom detached houses with associated circulation and landscaped areas
- Authority
- Dacorum Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Chalk M
- Postcode
- WD4 8AU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including any effect on openness, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to the provision of outdoor garden space, vehicle manoeuvring and levels of natural light and outlook
- The effect on the privacy of neighbouring occupiers, in particular those at Nos 34, 36 and 38 Rucklers Lane
- The effect on trees
- Would any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal's harmful impact on Green Belt openness as inappropriate development, combined with harm to character and appearance and failure to provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing delivery and economic benefits.
The moderate weight attributed to housing delivery benefits and economic benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial weight given to Green Belt harm and the significant weight given to harm to character and appearance and failure to provide acceptable living conditions, so very special circumstances were not established.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS11CS12CS32KL3KL4Policy 99Policy 100Appendix 3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Dacorum
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed26 October 20266003892Bulbourne Wood, New Road, Northchurch, Berkhamsted, HP4 1LN
- Dismissed2 October 20266011489Plot HD587047 of Lot B2A, Upper Bourne End Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 2RR
- Dismissed28 August 20266010273118 A Hempstead Road, Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, WD4 8AL
- Notice upheld14 July 20263350930Land Adjancet to The Old Brickworks, Spring Garden Lane, Northchurch, Herts, HP4 3GY
- Dismissed17 June 20266006042Land South of A4251 (North of A41), Tring, HP23 5RB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®