Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 November 20243337485

The Plough Public House, 89 North Road, Southall, UB1 2JN

demolition of the existing building and to erect a two storey with a partial basement mixed use new-build

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Francis M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the demolition of an existing community facility
  • whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with regard to space standards, daylight, outdoor space
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 1 Shackleton Road with particular reference to privacy, outlook and sunlight
  • whether the proposal would satisfy the housing needs for the area
  • whether the proposal would affect highway safety

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan on multiple grounds—character and appearance, loss of community facility, living conditions of future occupants and neighbours, housing need, and highway safety—with no material considerations outweighing the identified harm.

Framework references: 97, 200

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy D4, London Plan Policy D3, London Plan Policy D6, London Plan Policy HC7, London Plan Policy H10, London Plan Policy T3, London Plan Policy T4, Ealing Development Management DPD Policy 7.4, Ealing Development Management DPD Policy 7A, Ealing Development Management DPD Policy 7B, Ealing Core Strategy Policy 1.1(e)(i), Ealing Core Strategy Policy 3.8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.