®Planning appeal decision
5 - 7 Upper Ham Road, Richmond, TW10 5LD
Planning appeal 3337560 at 5 - 7 Upper Ham Road, Richmond, TW10 5LD (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was decided (invalid) on 23 October 2024 by Inspector Lancaster K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the planning application was valid in accordance with Article 7 of The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015.
a joint loft conversion
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Lancaster K
- Postcode
- TW10 5LD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the planning application was valid in accordance with Article 7 of The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015
What decided it
The site location plan as originally submitted did not include all land necessary to carry out the proposed development, rendering the application invalid and preventing the Inspector from determining the appeal on its merits.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Richmond upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 October 2026601587988 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
- Dismissed28 October 2026601583664 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
- Dismissed26 October 2026601187461-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
- Dismissed20 October 20266010388163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
- Dismissed19 October 20266013760Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.