Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 July 20243337840

Mixology, 93 Elvet Bridge, Durham City, DH1 3AG

Planning appeal 3337840 at Mixology, 93 Elvet Bridge, Durham City, DH1 3AG (Durham County Council) was dismissed on 11 July 2024 by Inspector Symmons J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed variation to condition No 3 on the living conditions of nearby residents, with respect to noise and disturbance.

the ‘Change of Use from Retail (E class) to Drinking Establishment (Sui Generis)’ without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref DM/21/01282/FPA, dated 22 July 2021

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Symmons J
Postcode
DH1 3AG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed variation to condition No 3 on the living conditions of nearby residents, with respect to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The proposed extension of opening hours into the early morning hours would significantly and adversely affect the living conditions of nearby residents through noise and disturbance, conflicting with Policy 31 of the County Durham Plan and Part 15 of the NPPF, with insufficient evidence to demonstrate mitigation of this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 6Policy 7Policy 9Policy 29Policy 31Policy 44Policy E4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 56Paragraph 8Paragraph 38Paragraph 123Paragraph 124Paragraph 128Paragraph 135Paragraph 180Paragraph 191

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

108 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Durham County Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed16 September 20266005969
    3 Roosevelt Road, Durham, DH1 1PS
  2. Dismissed16 September 20266004850
    119 Bradford Crescent, Durham, DH1 1HW
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266004494
    49 Annand Road, Durham, DH1 1PW
  4. Dismissed11 August 20266006359
    The Copse, Foxes Row, Brancepeth, DH7 8DH
  5. Allowed24 July 20263375422
    Harehill Farm, Haswell Plough, Durham, Durham, DH6 2BA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.