Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 August 20243337897

8 Strelley Way, London, W3 7AR

the change of use of dwellinghouse (Class C3) into a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) with ten bedrooms and ten occupants and provision of ancillary cycle parking and refuse storage

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Lancaster K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the use of the appeal property as a large HMO on the living conditions of occupiers of adjoining residential property, having particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the use of the appeal property as a large HMO on highway safety, having particular regard to the availability of car parking
  • whether suitable living conditions have been provided for current and future occupiers of the property

What decided it

The proposal would result in a materially more intensive use of the property generating significantly increased noise and disturbance to both neighbouring occupiers and future occupants, contrary to development plan policies requiring high standards of amenity.

Plan policies cited: Policy 7A of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document, Policy 7B of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document, Policy 1.1 of the Ealing Development Strategy 2026 Development Plan Document, Policy T6 of the London Plan, Policy T5 of the London Plan, Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy 3.5 of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document, Policy 7.4 of the Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.