Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 August 20243338082

Stocksfield , Borden Lane, LIPHOOK, West Sussex, GU30 7JZ

demolition of the existing dwellinghouse and the erection of a contemporary replacement dwelling with associated site works in a revised location

Authority
South Downs
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Harley S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the size of the replacement dwelling would be supported by planning policy
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area having regard to the location within the SDNP
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of nearby properties
  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Arun Valley Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area, and Ramsar Site with regard to groundwater abstraction

What decided it

The absence of sufficient certainty that water abstraction would not have adverse effects on the integrity of the Arun Valley sites, combined with policy conflicts on dwelling size, character and appearance, and living conditions harm, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan with no material considerations of sufficient weight to indicate otherwise.

Framework references: 60, 70, 71, 83, 231

Plan policies cited: Policy SD30, Policy H.1, Policy SD27, Policy SD5, Policy HD.1, Policy HD.3, Policy SD1, Policy SD4, Policy SD8, Policy S.1, Policy HD.2, Policy SD9, Policy SD17, Policy SD48

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.