Planning appeal decision
Stocksfield , Borden Lane, Liphook, West Sussex, GU30 7JZ
Planning appeal 3338082 at Stocksfield , Borden Lane, Liphook, West Sussex, GU30 7JZ (South Downs) was dismissed on 13 August 2024 by Inspector Harley S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the size of the replacement dwelling would be supported by planning policy.
demolition of the existing dwellinghouse and the erection of a contemporary replacement dwelling with associated site works in a revised location
- Authority
- South Downs
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Harley S
- Postcode
- GU30 7JZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the size of the replacement dwelling would be supported by planning policy
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area having regard to the location within the SDNP
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of nearby properties
- the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Arun Valley Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area, and Ramsar Site with regard to groundwater abstraction
What decided it
The absence of sufficient certainty that water abstraction would not have adverse effects on the integrity of the Arun Valley sites, combined with policy conflicts on dwelling size, character and appearance, and living conditions harm, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan with no material considerations of sufficient weight to indicate otherwise.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SD30Policy H.1Policy SD27Policy SD5Policy HD.1Policy HD.3Policy SD1Policy SD4Policy SD8Policy S.1Policy HD.2Policy SD9Policy SD17Policy SD48
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 60Paragraph 70Paragraph 71Paragraph 83Paragraph 231
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Downs
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Notice upheld9 February 20263346595Moodys Meadow, Petersfield Road, Bramdean, Hampshire, SO24 0JX
- Allowed18 December 20256000723The Sanctuary, Manor Farm Green, Twyford, Hampshire, SO21 1RA
- Allowed15 December 20253367752Hockley Golf Club, Winchester Road, Twyford, Hampshire, SO21 1PL
- Dismissed28 November 20253362628Land South of Mill Hill - Access From A283, Beach Green, Shoreham-by-Sea, West Sussex, BN43 5FD
- Allowed25 November 20253361555Land Opposite New Barn Farm House, Rake Road, West Sussex, GU30 7JU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®