Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 October 20243338589

Cherry Orchard Farm, Stoke Road, Layham, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP7 5RB

Planning appeal 3338589 at Cherry Orchard Farm, Stoke Road, Layham, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP7 5RB (Babergh District Council) was dismissed on 31 October 2024 by Inspector Major R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to local policy.

enlargement of approved dwelling, ground floor rear infill extension and front gable. Proposed application to be read in conjunction with approved Class Q application (Ref: DC/21/06064)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Major R
Postcode
IP7 5RB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to local policy
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of Bridge Barn with regard to privacy and outlook

What decided it

The appeal site is located outside the settlement boundary in an unsustainable rural location that fails to comply with Policy SP03, and the proposed dwelling would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policies LP17 and LP24.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP03Policy LP01Policy LP04Policy LP17Policy LP24Policy LP23
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 84Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 157

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

2 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Babergh District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed7 October 20266011354
    Land at Junction of Friars Street and Church Street, Sudbury, CO10 2AJ
  2. Allowed16 September 20266013583
    57 Vale View Road, Sproughton, Ipswich, IP8 3FS
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266011384
    34 Aldham Road, Hadleigh, IP7 6BP
  4. Allowed7 August 20266007359
    Oaks Farm, Hadleigh Road, Holton St Mary, CO7 6NW
  5. Dismissed5 August 20266005638
    Land East of Capel Road, Bentley, IP9 2DN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.