Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 November 20243338914

13 East Close, Rainham, RM13 9AJ

house conversion to 1 x 3 bed and 1 x 2 bed apartments scheme

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Harding C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers with regard to the standard of accommodation
  • the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of occupiers of nearby properties with particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The substantial harm to the living conditions of future occupiers, arising from the incompatible vertical stacking of bedrooms and living spaces and the privacy issues with the front-facing bedroom, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing supply and other modest benefits when assessed against the Framework.

The adverse impacts of granting permission, particularly the substantial harm to future occupiers' living conditions, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefit of housing supply and modest benefits of wheelchair accessibility and economic benefits, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 60

Plan policies cited: Policy 7, Policy 9, Policy 26, London Plan Policy D6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.