Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 July 20243338936

Rear of 46-48 High Street , London, EN5 5SJ

the erection of front and rear roof extensions and provision of a roof light on the side elevation; conversion of roof space into one flat

Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hobbs J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Conservation Area
  • Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with particular regard to the provision of internal space (Appeal B only)

What decided it

The proposals would cause less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area's character and appearance through incongruous and dominant dormer design, and this harm was not outweighed by the moderate weight given to housing benefits; additionally, Appeal B failed to provide acceptable living conditions due to inadequate floor-to-ceiling heights.

Framework references: 205, 208

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 London Plan March 2021, Policy D6 London Plan, Policy CS1 Barnet Local Plan Core Strategy, Policy CS5 Barnet Local Plan Core Strategy, Policy DM01 Barnet Local Plan Development Management Policies, Policy DM02 Barnet Local Plan Development Management Policies, Policy DM06 Barnet Local Plan Development Management Policies

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.