Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 August 20243339005

Larchfield, 81 West Hill, Aspley Guise, Milton Keynes, MK17 8DU

Planning appeal 3339005 at Larchfield, 81 West Hill, Aspley Guise, Milton Keynes, MK17 8DU (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 6 August 2024 by Inspector Gee R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and development plan policy, including an assessment of the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.

Amended access arrangements - closure of existing access, creation of new access further east

Authority
Central Bedfordshire
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Gee R
Postcode
MK17 8DU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and development plan policy, including an assessment of the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
  • whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Aspley Guise Conservation Area, including in relation to trees

What decided it

The profound and adverse impact on the character and appearance of the Aspley Guise Conservation Area through the removal of significant landscaping and protected trees outweighed the limited public benefits of the proposal.

The limited weight given to the public benefits of improved visibility and access repositioning was insufficient to outweigh the less than substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage asset and the statutory presumptions under s.72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HQ1Policy HE3Policy EE4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 155Paragraph 143

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

47 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Central Bedfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed15 September 20266007334
    Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
  2. Allowed4 September 20266007202
    2 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
  3. Dismissed7 August 20266007254
    Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
  4. Dismissed10 July 20266005439
    263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
  5. Dismissed8 July 20266007697
    142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.