®Planning appeal decision
224 Preston Hill, Harrow, HA3 9UJ
Without planning permission, the material change of use of the premises to a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) and flats and, without planning permission, the erection of a part single-storey and part two-storey rear extension, conversion of the former detached garage to primary living accommodation including the installation of a bathroom, kitchen and mezzanine floor, the erection of extensions to the rear of the former detached garage, and alterations to the roof form of the premises
- Authority
- London Borough of Brent
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Harbottle M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the roof form was altered as alleged in the enforcement notice
- Whether the alleged rear extension has planning permission by reason of permitted development rights or express planning permission
What decided it
The alleged rear extension that was actually constructed was a different development from those permitted under the certified permitted development rights and express planning permission, as it combined both extensions into a single more extensive development carried out without the required permission.
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.