Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 October 20243339294

96 Clifton Hill, LONDON, NW8 0JT

a one storey extension to replace existing mansard roof level, a new flat top mansard roof extension with slate tile cladding and lead roofing, two lead wrapped rear dormers with painted timber sash windows, two conservation roof lights to rear of mansard. Raised parapet walls, side chimney stacks and 2nd floor front and rear elevations to match with existing brickwork

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Skelly C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building, a Non-Designated Heritage Asset, and the surrounding area, including the setting of the Grade II listed buildings at 92 and 94 Clifton Hill and the St John's Wood Conservation Area

What decided it

The cumulative effect of the proposed changes would harm the traditional appearance and significance of the Non-Designated Heritage Asset, the setting of the adjacent listed buildings, and the character of the conservation area, with insufficient public benefits to justify this harm.

Framework references: 203, 205, 206, 208, 209

Plan policies cited: Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 40

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.