Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 September 20243339409

Pratts Green Farmhouse, Pratts Green Farm, Malting End, Kirtling, Newmarket , CB8 9HH

Planning appeal 3339409 at Pratts Green Farmhouse, Pratts Green Farm, Malting End, Kirtling, Newmarket , CB8 9HH (East Cambridgeshire District Council) was dismissed on 5 September 2024 by Inspector Bayliss G, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve the special architectural or historic interest of the Grade II listed building, Pratts Green Farmhouse, and the setting of the Grade II listed building, Ash Leas, and whether their significance as heritage assets would be preserved.

refurbishment and single extension of existing farmhouse. Demolition of existing (non-historic) extension. (Resubmission following withdrawal of 22/00682/FUL)

Authority
East Cambridgeshire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Bayliss G
Postcode
CB8 9HH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve the special architectural or historic interest of the Grade II listed building, Pratts Green Farmhouse, and the setting of the Grade II listed building, Ash Leas, and whether their significance as heritage assets would be preserved

What decided it

The considerable, adverse impact of the proposed extension on the special interest and significance of the listed Farmhouse significantly outweighed the moderate weight attributed to the collective public benefits.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of Pratts Green Farmhouse, attributed considerable importance and weight, significantly outweighed the moderate weight given to the collective public benefits of the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy Growth 2Policy ENV1Policy ENV2Policy ENV12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 195Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 207Paragraph 208
Judgments
R. (Juden) v the London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2021] EWHC 1368 (Admin); Kay v SSHCLG [2020] EWHC 2292 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

15 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Cambridgeshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed16 October 20266009201
    Rose Garden Cottege, 13 Soham Road, Fordham, Ely, CB7 5LD
  2. Allowed14 October 20266012656
    Land North East Of 70 St Johns Avenue, Newmarket, CB8 8DE
  3. Allowed3 August 20266009432
    Boundary Farm, Sutton Road, Witchford, CB62HX
  4. Allowed3 August 20266009280
    15 Newnham Street, Ely, CB7 4PG
  5. Allowed3 August 20266009239
    15 Newnham Street, Ely, CB7 4PG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.