Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 June 20243339437

2 Goose Cote Way, Keighley, West Yorkshire, BD22 7NF

a single storey rear extension

Authority
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hughes L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed extension would comply with the permitted development requirements set by Article 3, Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO, with specific regard to the impact of the proposed development on the amenity of any adjoining premises

What decided it

The proposed extension would harmfully affect the amenity of the adjoining premises at No. 4 Goose Cote Way through its over-dominant massing and enclosing effect, combined with unresolved overshadowing concerns, and therefore does not comply with the permitted development requirements of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO.

Framework references: 135

Plan policies cited: Policy DS5 of the Local Plan for the Bradford District Core Strategy Development Plan Document (2017), Householder Supplementary Planning Document (2012) Design Principle 3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.