Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 December 20243339552

1 Hungershall Park, Tunbridge Wells, Kent , TN4 8ND

Planning appeal 3339552 at 1 Hungershall Park, Tunbridge Wells, Kent , TN4 8ND (Tunbridge Wells Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 December 2024 by Inspector Leigh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

Erection of a detached dwelling, hard and soft landscaping and access from Hungershall Park

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Leigh C
Postcode
TN4 8ND

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal in the Green Belt

What decided it

The substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness is not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of housing supply, self-build provision, and energy efficiency measures.

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness by reason of inappropriateness, when weighed against limited benefits from housing supply, self-build provision, and energy efficiency, does not clearly outweigh the harm; very special circumstances do not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 5Core Policy 2Policy EN1Policy EN25saved Policy MGB1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 131Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

61 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tunbridge Wells

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed10 July 20266007577
    The Mill House, Powder Mill Lane, Tunbridge Wells, TN4 9EG
  2. Dismissed20 January 20263372709
    Barn to the East of Golford Road, Golford Road, Cranbrook, Kent, TN17 3NX
  3. Dismissed23 December 20253374092
    Woodlands Farm, Short Lane, Brenchley, Tonbridge, Kent, TN12 7BA
  4. Dismissed13 October 20253367190
    12 Flimwell Close, Flimwell, Wadhurst, Kent, TN5 7PP
  5. Dismissed30 July 20253363702
    6 Woodside Close, Pembury, Tunbridge Wells, TN2 4BQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.