Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed19 November 20243339561

8 Pole Hole Farm, Pye Corner, Gilston, Hertfordshire, CM20 2RP

conversion of existing agricultural building to a residential unit

Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Storey P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is a suitable location for housing, having regard to access to services and sustainable transport
  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and if so, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations that would amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The hedgerow boundary treatment in Appeal B preserves Green Belt openness and avoids the inappropriate development finding that defeated Appeal A, allowing the housing benefits to outweigh the location conflict under the tilted balance.

The adverse impacts of the proposal, limited to its location regarding access to services and sustainable transport, do not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery in an area with a demonstrated five-year housing land supply shortfall, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 152, 155, 56

Plan policies cited: Policy DPS2, Policy DPS1, Policy TRA1, Policy GBR1, Policy DES4, Policy NE2, Policy NE3, Policy WAT4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.