Planning appeal decision
2a Bridge Way, Whitton, Twickenham, TW2 7JJ
Planning appeal 3339880 at 2a Bridge Way, Whitton, Twickenham, TW2 7JJ (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 September 2024 by Inspector Lancaster K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal is permitted under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A, of the GPDO with particular regard to Paragraphs A.1(g) and A.1(j).
an extension to the ground floor living area
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Lancaster K
- Postcode
- TW2 7JJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposal is permitted under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A, of the GPDO with particular regard to Paragraphs A.1(g) and A.1(j)
What decided it
The proposed extension would extend beyond a wall forming a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse and would be more than half the width of the original dwellinghouse, exceeding the limitations set out at Paragraph A.1(j)(iii) of the GPDO and therefore does not constitute permitted development.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Richmond upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 October 2026601587988 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
- Dismissed28 October 2026601583664 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
- Dismissed26 October 2026601187461-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
- Dismissed20 October 20266010388163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
- Dismissed19 October 20266013760Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®