Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 December 20243340025

63 Dollis Hill Lane, London, NW2 6JH

Planning appeal 3340025 at 63 Dollis Hill Lane, London, NW2 6JH (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 9 December 2024 by Inspector Francis M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the host property and the character and appearance of the area.

retention of single storey rear extension, two storey side and rear extension, rear patio level, hip to gable roof and rear dormer and front porch with associated internal alterations and conversion of the property into two flats

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Francis M
Postcode
NW2 6JH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the host property and the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers with regards to floor to ceiling heights within the proposed rooms
  • whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers with regards to the provision of private outdoor space
  • whether adequate drainage measures would be provided
  • whether it would provide an adequate level of urban greening

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area caused by the bulky, cumbersome extensions with discordant roof forms and ungainly proportions outweighs the modest contribution to housing supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMP1Policy BD1Policy D3Policy D4Policy D6Policy BH13Policy SI 13Policy BSU13Policy BSU14Policy BH4Policy G5

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

595 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Planning permission granted25 September 20263377160
    26 Sidmouth Road, London, NW2 5HJ
  2. Notice varied and upheld8 September 20263365412
    29 Rannock Avenue, Brent, London, NW9 7LD
  3. Dismissed16 July 20266008179
    26 Craven Park Road, London, NW10 4AB
  4. Allowed23 January 20263375962
    8 Priory Gardens, Wembley, HA0 2QG
  5. Dismissed3 September 20253365907
    27 Cranhurst Road, London, NW2 4LJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.