Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 October 20243340108

Denham Mount , Blacksmiths Lane, Tatling End, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4HW

Planning appeal 3340108 at Denham Mount , Blacksmiths Lane, Tatling End, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4HW (Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *) was dismissed on 30 October 2024 by Inspector Dyer I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies, including any relevant effects on the openness of the Green Belt.

conversion and extension of the main country house and some of the listed and unlisted cottages and outbuildings to create a boutique hotel (Use Class C1) with new wellness centre, outdoor swimming pool, hot tub, 2 pickleball courts, outbuildings and associated parking, landscaping and alterations to entrance gates. Appeal B: APP/N0410/Y/24/3340124 Denham Mount, Blacksmiths Lane, Tatling End, Buckinghamshire UB9 4HW

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Dyer I
Postcode
UB9 4HW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies, including any relevant effects on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed buildings known as Denham Mount, Mount Cottage Denham Mount, Lodge Denham Mount and Entrance piers and gates at Denham Mount, and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that they possess
  • The effect of the proposal on the character of the site and surroundings
  • The effect of the proposal on biodiversity of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on transport networks
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of nearby dwellings, with particular reference to noise and disturbance
  • The effect of the proposal on the supply of housing in the area
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and the substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt, combined with considerable harm to the special interest of listed buildings and significant harm to biodiversity, were not clearly outweighed by other considerations and therefore very special circumstances did not exist to justify the development.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt and openness, considerable harm to heritage assets, and significant harm to biodiversity were not outweighed by the moderate weight given to economic benefits, tourism provision, and speculative concerns about the viability of residential use, resulting in dismissal of the appeal

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GB1Policy GB2Policy GB4Policy GB9Policy T2Policy T5Policy TR5Policy EP3Policy H9Policy CP8Policy CP9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 88Paragraph 89Paragraph 114Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 180Paragraph 186Paragraph 203Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

69 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice varied and upheld4 September 20263349251
    Maple Cottage, Billett Lane, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL3 6DJ
  2. Notice varied and upheld8 July 20263347247
    Small Acres Farm, Stoke Common Road, Fulmer , Buckinghamshire , SL3 6HA
  3. Dismissed7 July 20263369166
    38 Tockley Road, Burnham, Buckinghamshire, SL1 7DH
  4. Allowed29 May 20263376692
    Boveney Court Farm Boveney Road, Dorney, Windsor, Buckinghamshire , SL4 6QG
  5. Notice varied and upheld14 May 20263376465
    Land at Denham Mount Blacksmiths Lane, Tatling End, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4HW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.