Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 December 20243340135

Land known as Harlands, Highcross Road, Southfleet, Kent, DA13 9PH

the demolition of a range of existing buildings and the erection of a single-storey dwelling and garage

Authority
Dartford Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pearce J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of development plan policy and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the Westwood Area of Special Conservation
  • whether the site is a suitable location for housing having regard to development plan policy and accessibility to services and facilities
  • whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the setting of the Grade II listed building, Ivy House
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
  • if it is inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, or any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would have a greater impact on openness than existing development, and the other considerations do not clearly outweigh this harm to justify very special circumstances.

Framework references: 11, 109, 154, 209

Plan policies cited: Policy M12, Policy S5, Policy M1, Policy M6, Policy M14, Policy M5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.