Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 December 20243340289

14A Harestone Hill, CATERHAM, Surrey, CR3 6SX

new detached dwelling, associated parking and landscaping to the rear of 14A Harestone Hill

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Carpenter C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site, existing house and surrounding area
  • the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular reference to outlook and privacy
  • biodiversity and the measures necessary to avoid, mitigate or compensate for any negative effects
  • whether living conditions for future occupiers would be acceptable, with particular reference to external amenity space

What decided it

The combined significant harm to the character and appearance of the Harestone Valley Special Residential Character Area, the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, and the failure to establish the absence of protected species before determination, when weighed against the moderate benefit of delivering one dwelling in a context of housing shortfall, resulted in adverse impacts that significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.

The moderate weight given to housing delivery and limited economic benefit were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the considerable harm to character and appearance, neighbouring living conditions, and biodiversity.

Framework references: 11, 99, 139, 186

Plan policies cited: Tandridge Local Plan: Part 2 – Detailed Policies 2014 Policy DP7, Tandridge Local Plan: Part 2 – Detailed Policies 2014 Policy DP8, Caterham, Chaldon and Whyteleafe Neighbourhood Plan 2021 Policy CCW5, Caterham, Chaldon and Whyteleafe Neighbourhood Plan 2021 Policy CCW4, Tandridge Core Strategy 2008 Policy CSP18, Tandridge Core Strategy 2008 Policy CSP17

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.