Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld23 October 20243340336

84 North Circular Road, Stonebridge, London, NW1 0QS

Planning appeal 3340336 at 84 North Circular Road, Stonebridge, London, NW1 0QS (London Borough of Brent) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 23 October 2024 by Inspector Russell J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The standard of living conditions within the HMO and flats.

Without planning permission, the material change of use of the premises to a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) and flats

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Russell J
Postcode
NW10 0QS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The standard of living conditions within the HMO and flats
  • The effect of the mixed use on the living conditions of neighbours
  • Its effect on the character and appearance of the local area
  • Its effect on the supply of family-sized accommodation in the local area
  • The effect of a refusal of planning permission on the HMO and flat occupiers

What decided it

The bedsits are so undersized that occupiers would suffer unacceptably cramped and noisy living conditions, and the change of use resulted in loss of a family home, which harms outweigh the benefit of providing accommodation for vulnerable occupiers who would otherwise become homeless.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy D6London Plan Policy T5London Plan Policy T6Brent Local Plan Policy DMP1Brent Local Plan Policy BH13Brent Local Plan Policy BH10Brent Local Plan Policy BH11Brent Local Plan Policy BT2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 773 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice upheld30 September 20263359486
    30 Randall Avenue, London, NW2 7RN
  2. Planning permission granted25 September 20263377160
    26 Sidmouth Road, London, NW2 5HJ
  3. Notice upheld24 September 20263365164
    Land and Garage, Rear of 21 Ivy Road and Adjacent to 31 Cedar Road, London, NW2 6SN
  4. Split Decision17 September 20263357462
    61 Alder Grove, London, NW2 7DE
  5. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263365031
    73A and the Rear Part of 73 Willesden Lane, Kilburn, London, NW6 7RR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.