Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 July 20243340383

Ellisville, 1 Pitt Street, 1 Pitt Street, Radcliffe, Choose a Country/Region..., M26 3TF

balcony on roof of extension with a toughened obscure glazed balustrade with stainless steel post and top rail at 1100mm high

Authority
Bury Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Moore J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to privacy, noise and disturbance
  • Whether any harm arising is outweighed by material considerations, including personal circumstances

What decided it

The balcony fundamentally alters the privacy relationship with neighbouring properties by enabling significantly increased overlooking from an elevated position, creating unacceptable harm to neighbouring occupiers that is not justified by the appellant's personal circumstances.

Plan policies cited: Saved Policy H2/3 of the Bury Unitary Development Plan 1997, Saved Policy EN7/2 of the Bury Unitary Development Plan 1997, Supplementary Planning Document 6: Alterations and Extensions to Residential Properties

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.