Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 September 20243340639

6 Grosvenor Mansions, Broad Walk, Buxton, Derbyshire, SK17 6JH

Planning appeal 3340639 at 6 Grosvenor Mansions, Broad Walk, Buxton, Derbyshire, SK17 6JH (High Peak Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 September 2024 by Inspector Smith H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses, and preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Buxton Central Conservation Area.

the repair and restoration of all sash windows

Authority
High Peak Borough Council
Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Smith H
Postcode
SK17 6JH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses, and preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Buxton Central Conservation Area

What decided it

The irreversible loss of historic glass and the visual and material changes to the sash windows would harm the special interest and significance of the listed building and conservation area, and this harm was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EQ7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 207Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

47 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in High Peak

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed5 October 20266013259
    Shady Oak Inn, Long Hill, Fernilee, SK23 7HD
  2. Allowed30 September 20266009410
    Land Rear Of 53 Beresford Avenue., Chapel-en-le-Frith, SK23 0PZ
  3. Dismissed21 September 20266011421
    Land Adjacent To Salisbury Cottages, Unnamed Road From Salisbury Street To Salisbury Cottages, Hadfield, Glossop, SK13 1NN
  4. Allowed21 September 20266010311
    15 Compton Road, Buxton, SK17 9DN
  5. Dismissed4 September 20266011027
    The Rising Rest Home, Primrose Lane, Simmondley, Glossop, SK13 6LW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.