Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 September 20243340648

Kilmington Church Road, CATERHAM, Woldingham, Surrey, CR3 7JG

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hall C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2023 and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The cumulative volume increase of 238% from the original building constitutes a disproportionate addition that fails the Green Belt exception test and cannot be justified by very special circumstances.

Framework references: 154, 152, 153

Plan policies cited: Policy DP10, Policy DP13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.