Planning appeal decision
Myndful Mushrooms, Jolly Moon,, Land North of Bridge Bungalow, Lower Road, Drove Links Road, South Wonston, Hampshire, SO21 3HR
Planning appeal 3340652 at Myndful Mushrooms, Jolly Moon,, Land North of Bridge Bungalow, Lower Road, Drove Links Road, South Wonston, Hampshire, SO21 3HR (Winchester City Council) was dismissed on 23 July 2024 by Inspector Martinson P, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is in an appropriate location for the development having regard to the requirements of local and national policy, including: a) the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area; b) whether there is a functional need for a temporary dwelling to house a rural worker which cannot be satisfied by existing nearby accommodation; and c) whether there is confidence that the enterprise has been planned on a sound financial basis.
Temporary rural workers dwelling, agricultural building, forest school and ancillary works
- Authority
- Winchester City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Martinson P
- Postcode
- SO21 3HR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is in an appropriate location for the development having regard to the requirements of local and national policy, including: a) the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area; b) whether there is a functional need for a temporary dwelling to house a rural worker which cannot be satisfied by existing nearby accommodation; and c) whether there is confidence that the enterprise has been planned on a sound financial basis
- the effect of the development on protected species
- the effect of the development on highway safety
What decided it
the moderate harm to landscape character from the temporary dwelling, combined with the unresolved risk of harm to protected species, outweighed the limited benefits of the scheme
the limited social and economic benefits of the forest school and mushroom enterprise, and the benefits of the temporary dwelling to that enterprise, did not outweigh the harm to landscape character and the unresolved harm to protected species
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS1Policy DM1Policy MTRA4Policy DM11Policy CP20Policy DM15Policy DM23Policy CP16Policy CP10Policy DM18
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 186Paragraph 180
- Judgments
- Millington v SSETR & Shrewsbury and Atcham BC (2000) JPL 297
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Winchester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed22 May 20266003190Hiawatha, Chapel Road, Swanmore, Hampshire, SO322QA
- Dismissed27 November 20253366385Unit D, Knowle Village, Fareham, PO17 5FL
- Dismissed27 November 20253366363Knowle Village, Farnham, PO17 5FL
- Allowed19 November 20253366618Land at Southwick Road/School Road, Wickham, PO17 6FE
- Allowed4 July 20253355833Stratton Highways Road, Compton, Winchester, SO21 2DF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®