Planning appeal decision
New Oak Farm Hardwick Lane, Lyne, Chertsey, KT16 0AA
Planning appeal 3340733 at New Oak Farm Hardwick Lane, Lyne, Chertsey, KT16 0AA (Runnymede Borough Council) was allowed on 10 December 2024 by Inspector Bristow T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
described on the application form as ‘change of use of land to provide an extension to an existing Gypsy/Traveller site comprising the siting of 4 mobile homes and 4 additional touring caravans.’
- Authority
- Runnymede Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Bristow T
- Postcode
- KT16 0AA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- If any harm would result, whether there are very special circumstances to justify allowing the appeal
What decided it
The substantial weight attributed to the personal circumstances of the appellant's extended family, combined with moderate weight for unmet pitch need, was found to amount to very special circumstances outweighing the limited additional Green Belt harm.
The moderate weight given to the benefit of additional pitch provision and the substantial weight given to personal circumstances, taken together, were found to constitute very special circumstances outweighing the (limited) harm to the Green Belt from inappropriateness and loss of openness.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EE18Policy SD7Policy EE10Policy EE1Policy EE2Policy SL22RSS policy NRM6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 57Paragraph 55Paragraph 114Paragraph 180
- Judgments
- Reed v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Bracknell Forest District Council [2014] EWCA Civ 241; Hertfordshire County Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1473; Smith v SSLUHC & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 1391; Collins v SSCLG [2013] EWCA Civ 1193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Runnymede Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed29 October 20266006748St Merryns Copse, Chobham Road, Ottershaw, KT16 0QE
- Dismissed17 August 20266008286203 Almners Road, Lyne, KT16 0BL
- Allowed11 August 20266006147Tamar, Hurst Lane, Egham, TW20 8QJ
- Notice varied and upheld13 July 20263377703Land Adjacent to Warren Farm, Green Road, Thorpe, Surrey, TW20 8QT
- Dismissed12 May 20266002530Unit No 5, Alexandra Court, Englefield Green, Surrey, TW20 0RR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®