Planning appeal decision
Potters Farm, Illey Lane, Halesowen, B62 0HJ
Planning appeal 3340808 at Potters Farm, Illey Lane, Halesowen, B62 0HJ (Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 19 November 2024 by Inspector Hughes L, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework ('the Framework') (2023) and any relevant development plan policies.
the erection of a rural workers dwelling
- Authority
- Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hughes L
- Postcode
- B62 0HJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework ('the Framework') (2023) and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the Area of High Historic Landscape Value
- the effect of the proposal upon any archaeological remains
- whether, having regard to national planning policy that seeks to avoid isolated new homes in the countryside, there is an essential need for a rural worker to live permanently at or near their place of work
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The cumulative Green Belt, heritage and archaeological harm was not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits, so the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development did not exist.
The substantial weight attached to Green Belt harm, together with great weight given to heritage harm and archaeological harm, was not clearly outweighed by the minor or minimal weight given to housing, economic and social benefits, so very special circumstances did not exist and the balance tipped against the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S23Policy S13Policy CSP4Policy ENV2Policy ENV3Policy S6Policy S7Policy S8Policy S15Policy S24
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 152Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 200Paragraph 205Paragraph 208Paragraph 209Paragraph 84Paragraph 153
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Dudley
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed17 June 20253362441Coombs Wood Sports & Social Club, Stewarts & Lloyds Pavilion Stewarts Road, Halesowen, B62 8ND
- Dismissed9 June 20253357620Land to the West of Tipton Road, Tipton Road, Dudley , DY1 4TA
- Allowed2 April 20253345744Land at Illeybrook Farm, Illey Lane, Halesowen, B62 0HE
- Allowed4 September 20243341383Land Adjacent to M5 Motorway, Lowlands Farm, Illey Lane, Halesowen, West Midlands, B62 0HJ
- Dismissed3 March 2022328759820 Smithy Lane, Brierley Hill, DY5 4UB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®