Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 August 20243340811

Land off Storridge Road, Westbury, BA13 4HJ

Planning appeal 3340811 at Land off Storridge Road, Westbury, BA13 4HJ (Wiltshire Council) was dismissed on 30 August 2024 by Inspector Woodwards O, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the appeal site is an appropriate location for development of this type, having regard to local and national planning policy and guidance.

the demolition of number 13 and 14 Storridge Road and the erection of up to 200 dwellings (including affordable housing), with public open space, structural planting, landscaping, sustainable drainage system and vehicular access point

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Woodwards O
Postcode
BA13 4HJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the appeal site is an appropriate location for development of this type, having regard to local and national planning policy and guidance
  • whether or not the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to noise from the West Wiltshire Trading Estate (WWTE), and the capacity of the site to accommodate proposed noise mitigation works
  • whether or not the proposed development would create potential future risks to the operation of the WWTE, with particular regard to the 'agent of change' principle and noise
  • the effect of the proposal on ecology, including on the integrity of the Bath and Bradford on Avon Bat Special Area of Conservation (SAC) particularly with regard to bat mitigation, and the capacity of the site to accommodate proposed ecological works

What decided it

The unacceptable living conditions that would result from the need for closed windows to mitigate noise from the adjoining trading estate, combined with conflict with the Council's spatial strategy, meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits even under the tilted balance.

Although the tilted balance under Framework paragraph 11(d)(ii) was engaged due to a 3.85 year housing land supply, the Inspector found the adverse impacts—principally conflict with the spatial strategy and unacceptable living conditions from noise, together with unresolved agent of change risk, limited character harm and limited construction harm—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of market and affordable housing, economic benefits, biodiversity net gain, open space and highway improvements.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 1Core Policy 2Core Policy 32Core Policy 57Core Policy 35Core Policy 50Core Policy 43
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 180Paragraph 135Paragraph 191Paragraph 193Paragraph 185Paragraph 226Paragraph 77Paragraph 72Paragraph 11Paragraph 225Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wiltshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed30 September 20266007924
    Beehive Cottage, Portway, Salisbury, SP4 6BL
  2. Dismissed13 July 20266002635
    Castle View Care Centre, 8 Old Castle Road, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 3SF
  3. Allowed23 June 20266006895
    Poles Farm, Swallowcliffe, Salisbury, SP3 5NX
  4. Dismissed11 June 20266004915
    The Spice Merchant, Holloway, Malmesbury, SN16 9HX
  5. Dismissed6 May 20266002845
    Land South of Drynham Lane, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, BA14 0PL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.