®Planning appeal decision
Dunston House, Sandy Lane, Hemingstone, Suffolk, IP6 9QD
demolition of existing dwelling and erection of replacement two storey five bedroomed dwelling, erection of triple bay cartlodge with store over, without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 2533/14, dated 1 October 2014
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Spencer D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the effect of removing the disputed condition would be appropriate for the rural location having regard to the development plan and any material considerations
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with JLP Policies SP03, LP04 and LP13 by failing to demonstrate an overriding business need for holiday accommodation in an isolated rural location lacking accessibility by various transport modes, and would result in greater scale of activity and vehicle movements than the extant permission allows.
Framework references: 84, 88, 89
Plan policies cited: Policy H8, Policy H7, Policy CS1, Policy CS2, JLP Policy SP03, JLP Policy LP04, JLP Policy LP13
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.