Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 November 20243340878

Dunston House, Sandy Lane, Hemingstone, Suffolk, IP6 9QD

Planning appeal 3340878 at Dunston House, Sandy Lane, Hemingstone, Suffolk, IP6 9QD (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 1 November 2024 by Inspector Spencer D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the effect of removing the disputed condition would be appropriate for the rural location having regard to the development plan and any material considerations.

demolition of existing dwelling and erection of replacement two storey five bedroomed dwelling, erection of triple bay cartlodge with store over, without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 2533/14, dated 1 October 2014

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Spencer D
Postcode
IP6 9QD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the effect of removing the disputed condition would be appropriate for the rural location having regard to the development plan and any material considerations

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with JLP Policies SP03, LP04 and LP13 by failing to demonstrate an overriding business need for holiday accommodation in an isolated rural location lacking accessibility by various transport modes, and would result in greater scale of activity and vehicle movements than the extant permission allows.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H8Policy H7Policy CS1Policy CS2JLP Policy SP03JLP Policy LP04JLP Policy LP13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 84Paragraph 88Paragraph 89

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed18 June 20266006248
    Old Wood Hall, Great Green, Thrandeston, Diss, IP21 4BN
  2. Dismissed16 June 20266006837
    Barn Owl Campsite, Felsham Road, Rattlesden, IP30 0SG
  3. Dismissed5 March 20263376024
    Grange Farm Barn Potash Lane, Wyverstone, Stowmarket, IP14 4SL
  4. Allowed11 July 20253354473
    Camping Site And Premises Sudbourne Hall Farm, Mill Road, Wyverstone, Suffolk, IP14 4SE
  5. Dismissed20 December 20243343459
    Land at Moneypot Lane , Redgrave, IP22 1SF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.